Game widow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we simply use uniform numbering, i.e. 1-35 for GOG release that includes bonus tracks, and then 36 and on for the extra tracks? Current numbering is confusing. — [[User:Gilrond|Gilrond]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Gilrond|talk]])</small></sup> 04:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC) |
Should we simply use uniform numbering, i.e. 1-35 for GOG release that includes bonus tracks, and then 36 and on for the extra tracks? Current numbering is confusing. — [[User:Gilrond|Gilrond]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Gilrond|talk]])</small></sup> 04:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
:you are the only person who has ever suggested it's confusing, so no. — [[User:Game widow|Game widow]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Game widow| talk]] )</small></sup> 11:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC) |
:you are the only person who has ever suggested it's confusing, so no. — [[User:Game widow|Game widow]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Game widow| talk]] )</small></sup> 11:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::My point is that numbering is all over the place, because different stores use different order. But I suppose it's going to be confusing in either case, so wouldn't make a difference, so we can leave it like this. — [[User:Gilrond|Gilrond]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Gilrond|talk]])</small></sup> 16:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:27, 12 August 2020
Should we simply use uniform numbering, i.e. 1-35 for GOG release that includes bonus tracks, and then 36 and on for the extra tracks? Current numbering is confusing. — Gilrond (talk) 04:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- you are the only person who has ever suggested it's confusing, so no. — Game widow ( talk ) 11:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)