File talk:Tw2 poster iorvethwanted.png

Fonts
Epistula Croatica is not the font used for the posters - it maybe similar to it and it is Glagolitic, too, but it's not the font used for the posters. Just compare some letters ;) Imho informations like this belong to the Font article, not to an image description. I would prefer to reset the last edit, go back to the previous image description (allthough even this one was giving more info than neccessary for this image) and enhance the Font's article. »»Dove«« (talk) 21:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with Epistula Croatica, but the script of some posters like this one is clearly classic Glagolitic (it has rounded shapes). Some other posters use different script (more squarish, less rounded) and I didn't yet analyze it but it also looks like Glagolitic just of different style. I think it's OK to actually give full decoding of the poster in each poster. But if you want a summary about scripts in general, it can be added to the posters article. Or may be there should be a separate article for IC scripts? The font article you linked to is about OOC font, i.e. the interface font of the game, not about the in-game script used in posters, maps and stuff like runes on the swords. -- Gilrond (talk) 02:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, so I reverted article to Dove's version. Maybe we could create some article about alphabets in adaptations? Not only games, some letters was also in comic books as I remember. -- SMiki5five (talk) 06:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure, such article sounds useful. I can start it, but a bit later. Feel free to do it if you want as well. -- Gilrond (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * No doubt, the posters are in Glagolitic letters - CDPR said this also in the artbooks. But why a separate article? In the Hexer-Wiki I wrote everything about the known fonts, for the books and the game(s) as well, all fonts/scripts and background info... But maybe I'm wrong in understanding the intention of the Fonts article? »»Dove«« (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * May be it's fine, but I thought that article is about the game interface, rather than about IG scritps which are kind of part of the lore. I.e. IC / OOC difference. May be it can be all clarified in one article as well to avoid confusion. Or the font article can be renamed to something like "interface fonts" and the new one can be called "Witcher lore scripts and alphabets" or something of that sort. -- Gilrond (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * We already have one font article, why not rework that one? — Game widow (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I rather thought about article describing alphabets in The Witcher world depicted in adaptations, no about fonts being a part of interfaces or using in book covers :) - SMiki5five (talk) 13:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That's why we have section headings. The main portion could be about the books, the we could move game-specific stuff to game-specific sections. — Game widow (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll probably expand the article with some info about in-game scripts or make a new one. There is actually a distinction between font and script / alphabet. So not sure if all that belongs in the current article. At the very least it would need to be renamed. Meanwhile can anyone please help with this decoding case. I'd appreciate some input before putting it on the wiki. — Gilrond (talk) 17:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)