Talk:The Hermit at Lac Célavy

The Hermit
SPOILER he is actually same Hermit as one from Murky Waters, its said at the end of quest --— Juraj103 (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Double spoiler: he is the lady herself — Game widow ( talk ) 17:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I quite do not understand that... how could she be advisor to Foltest ? OK maybe that I understand but when you are geting sword from her she says ´´the hermit admitted he knew you, remember ?´´ so can you explain me what I missed ?
 * I admit that her wording is odd, but the journal entry itself says she and the hermit are one and the same — Game widow ( talk ) 20:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe Lady = Hermit at Lac Célavy ≠ Hermit from Murky Waters? — SMiki5five (talk) 21:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I doubt, they look similarly and there is that strange wording--— Juraj103 (talk) 05:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * We should remember that TW3 isn't 100% faithful to novels and previous games. They could just change their ideas for the Hermit and the Lady. So in TW1 the Hermit ≠ the Lady, in TW3 the Hermit = the Lady. — SMiki5five (talk) 10:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree with SMiki5five — Game widow ( talk ) 13:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Pure speculation - she could be neither nymph nor vila, but some unclassified powerful multidimensional being, like Gaunter or Unicorns - and after TW1 she "absorbed" Hermit's self into her own. — SMiki5five (talk) 10:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I was not the one who designated her as a nymph, my original name page simply had her as a game NPC. — Game widow ( talk ) 14:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It was actually Geralt himself (in the TW1 journal) who thought she was a nymph/vila. Maybe could we change pagename to "being" or "character"? — SMiki5five (talk) 21:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)