Talk:Auberon Muircetach

Alway loved that twist than in saga her father (Emhyr Deithwen) and even great-ancestor (Auberon) wanted to fu*k her. Game of Thrones is nothing to compare with this kind :D --— Juraj103 (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Auberon rather didn't want... at least physically :P — SMiki5five (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * But you know it still kinda blows. And both time it was like ´´incest to save the world´´ XD --— Juraj103 (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * And both times something went wrong (happily) :P
 * Though... you know, Ciri is technically only 1/256 of Auberon's blood. Hard to say if it is still incest, I've never heard about incesting with someone's great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather o_O — SMiki5five (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Auberon is really the father of Lara? "luned" is often used in novels but that does not always confirm a family ties.--— Gwynbleidds (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * He said that Ciri had had Shiadhal eyes - so he had knew Shiadhal, Lara's mother
 * When he was dying, he said something like "Shiadhal? Good to see you here. You know, they said you are dead" - so he was clearly in really good relationship with her.
 * And, finally (thinking that Ciri is Lara): "Caemm a me, luned. Come to me, daughter. Caemm a me, elaine"
 * For me, it rather clearly suggests his parentship... — SMiki5five (talk) 21:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes I know all these details, you can also add that Auberon has the same hair color as Ciri but for me, it is only an interesting theory. I do not think that Sapkowski speaks in the dynastic descriptions about it. --— Gwynbleidds (talk) 00:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Only some notes are told from perspective of the omniscient narrator. There are several sentences "little is known about XYZ" or "there are not any details on ZYX" - so the absence of specific informations isn't the proof of falsehood of these informations.
 * But maybe I should clarify info in the article a bit. — SMiki5five (talk) 14:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes I includes very well your point of view SMiki5five. Otherwise I have never said that it was false but for my part, I need a little more proofs. :p (apologize for my poor English)--— Gwynbleidds (talk) 14:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * My English isn't better, I suppose :P — SMiki5five (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)